Hi,

On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:22 PM, steve <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I disagree with the statement that it was an overdose. The dose of sarcasm 
> doled
> out by Ashwin was in perfect proportion to the dose of incoherent half-baked
> tech gyaan Girish relives himself off on this list.
>

       Is sarcasm as a fitting response to half-baked tech gyaan ? IMHO, No.

> Why the double standards ? If one has a big enough problem with Ashwin's reply
> so as to voice it, one should have the same problem with Girish's
> mis-information, personal propaganda and soopbox rants.
>

     No double standards that I could see. People have been asking
Girish to stop his incoherent mails, and I am doing the same to
Ashwin's sarcasm.

> If on the other hand, ignoring Girish is something you can do, I think you can
> do the same for Ashwin's sarcasm laden replies ...ah ! or do you think Ashwin
> needs to be treated differently than Girish ?
>

Yes, filtered out Ashwin's responses as well, just like I do Girish's.
I, nor anyone else, need to apply different rules on this list to
anyone. Thanks


-- 
Thank you
Balachandran Sivakumar

Arise Awake and stop not till the goal is reached.
                                                             - Swami Vivekananda

Mail: [email protected]
Blog: http://benignbala.wordpress.com/
_______________________________________________
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
ILUGC Mailing List Guidelines:
http://ilugc.in/mailinglist-guidelines

Reply via email to