Hi Priyanka, Here are my thoughts on this subject.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Priyanka Sarkar <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear All, > > We thought of coming up a good story on the distro release time span. > Our question is 'With many distros going for a six-monthly release > cycle, do you think the release cycles of distros are too short? (And > users don't have to upgrade on a frequent basis?) ' If users want the latest or bleeding edge sotware (mostly the case on personal computers), they can always keep upgrading to the latest release. Even if they don't want to follow such a short upgrade cycle and have reasonably latest software, distros like Ubuntu have LTS releases that get a lot updates backported from the newer releases and are supported for a longer time. For servers it makes sense to stick to stable and thoroughly tested releases like that of Debian which are rock-solid work just fine compromising the need to have the latest software in favour of slightly dated versions. Mostly in production environments, people tend to prefer no changes unless they require newer software or want to upgrade to the newer release which comes out once in a few years. I use a combination of Debian unstable and testing on my laptop and that helps me have the bleeding edge software. Of course there are greater chances for crashes and critical bugs to make the desktop unusable, but with a little bit of know-how it is very much possible to recover from such scenarios. I prefer rolling releases of distros instead of one big fat release that comes out every 6 months or so as the downloads are incremental instead of bulky. Debian suits me best here. Thanks & Regards, Guruprasad _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc ILUGC Mailing List Guidelines: http://ilugc.in/mailinglist-guidelines
