Nope I think ur calculations add up correct. May b I'd have to go back
and check the stuff that I did :o)

What is the usual way to calculate this bandwidth, is FTP ok ??
I'll run a fresh set of tests and up date u guys..
Thanx :)
-js

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robins Tharakan
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 10:00 AM
To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list
Subject: RE: [ilugd] Software RAID performence


ok i'll put my side of calculations, maybe they are wrong... but lets c.

(firstly, B=Bytes, b=bits)

these are 10Mbit cards.. 

=10 Mb/sec 
=(10/8) MB/sec  (byte = 8 bits..)
=1.2x MBytes/sec 

which i think should then be the upper limit on a 10Mbps card...right?

therefore a 1000KB/s transfer rates are about 83%. they are not
fantastic agreed, but they arent that bad.

but then how do you get 3/4 MBps?? or are you talking about 3/4 Mbps? 

if its 4 Mbits/sec i think the capacity utilization is darn low... 
if its 4 MBytes/sec... you've just set the world record.

either way, you have lots of work to do (maybe set a patent for the
combination of cards used ;-)

just kidding, but well please anyone get me correct if i bundled up
majorly somewhere..

affly
robins

On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 09:25, Jasmeet S. Virdi wrote:
> Point 3/5: Am not sure whether u got the figures correct. But on my 
> win-win LAN, with 10 Mbps cards we get an effective rate of 3-4 Mbps 
> with intel Pros. R u sure about the lin-lin rates ? How did u go about

> measuring this performance ? I am interested, mayb my calculations 
> were wrong !!
> 
> -js
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of Robins Tharakan
> Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 10:53 PM
> To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list
> Subject: Re: [ilugd] Software RAID performence
> 
> 
> 
> yikes!! thats a *lo[t|g]* of questions....
> i'll try to comment on a few...
> 
> 1. i think the celeron would be too slow to be able to extract the 
> performance (although i have *no* idea about the add-on card 
> performance).
> 
> 2. i dont presume ram should affect, if the system only does raid. 
> although ofcourse ram gives better performance (but thats more of an 
> obvious point. more ram ofcourse means better caching/performance 
> etc..)
> 
> 3. 100M cards.. hmm.. i think that equates to a ~10Mbyte/s (per
> interface) are you sure thats the performance you are aiming at? i 
> mean, i agree burst speeds are relatively better, but for an average 
> speed, i think this would be a bottleneck.
> 
> 4. although i am unclear as to what is the effective purpose (dataset 
> calculations ok, but basically is it scattered data, or backup sort of

> sequential data?) frankly, if heat is a trouble ( a single 40Gb 7200 
> rpm is giving me worries at home!) i think you could easily go for a 
> 4800rpm (adding to which is cost savings). if ofcourse you are looking

> at scattered data, 7200 is the way to go.
> 
> 5. i have found good data rates of about 1000kb/s on 10Mbps (compex 
> etc) cards when transferring from linux-linux systems. (ofcourse 
> win-linux are generally lower [win9x-linux are far lower than 
> win2k-linux]), so i believe the low cost ones arent that bad for 
> normal use. unless ofcourse you have a chance of data corruption (bad 
> wiring, lot of disturbance
> etc...)
> 
> 6. i used ext3 mainly because i didnt want to take a chance, and 
> frankly i hadnt worked on anything else as yet (then). but i have 
> heard good reviews (and dangerous warnings) about jfs and reiser...  
> but i have no idea.. (sorry just adding up my experience..!)
> 
> affly
> robins
> 
> On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 22:35, Ambar Roy wrote:
> > Hi,
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ilugd mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ilugd mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
> 


_______________________________________________
ilugd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd


_______________________________________________
ilugd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd

Reply via email to