> GPL says you must release the GPLed code under GPL. What if you don't > release the source code for free > (you set a high price for your modified source) > It is silent on that.
But I would have thought "market forces" would take care of this, right? I mean, if the source was really valuable to others, I guess ten people could have pooled together their money and "bought" one copy of the source, and then redistributed it free (of cost). In fact, when I see that the GPL does not stipulate a strong clause for how much you can charge for releasing a copy of your source, I feel that this must have been the sort of logic... "Let the market forces free up whatever is worth freeing up anyway." Just my two bits. The GPL continues to be something whose shades of grey we keep debating. :) Shuvam _______________________________________________ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
