Hi Dears, Does anyone know how to write a firewall ipchains scripts for diffirent users on the LAN ? and how to block the yahoo messenger port thru firewall ???
Pls help me in this matter. Regds. Amrik.. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Send ilugd mailing list submissions to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of ilugd digest..." > > Please trim replies before posting. > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: apt-get (Sandip Bhattacharya) > 2. Re: LTSP - What is this beast (avnathan) > 3. Re: LTSP - What is this beast (LinuxLingam) > 4. Re: TCPA? get worried (Ankit khare) > 5. Re: apt-get (LinuxLingam) > 6. test ... please ignore (Sharninder Singh) > 7. Fedora Core 1 hangs on set hostname ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > 8. Re: test ... please ignore (Raj Mathur) > 9. Re: test ... please ignore (Abhijit Menon-Sen) > 10. [Fwd: ILUG-D: 802.11x networks in India, Unlicensed?] > (Nishikant Kapoor) > 11. [Fwd: ILUG-D: monthly_meet] (Nishikant Kapoor) > 12. Re: LTSP - What is this beast (vivek khurana) > 13. Re: Re: test ... please ignore (Sharninder Singh) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 10:55:14 +0530 > From: Sandip Bhattacharya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [ilugd] apt-get > To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed > > LinuxLingam wrote: > > > > > > # apt-get install qt > > Reading Package Lists... Done > > Building Dependency Tree... Done > > You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > libdv: Depends: libXv.so.1 > > [...] > > Depends: libmad but it is not going to be installed > > Depends: libmad.so.0 > > E: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages (or > > specify a solution). > > > > One too many forced RPM install made. :) > > You have to make up your mind while maintainng your system. > > Are you going to let your package manager manage your software, or are > you going to do it yourself? If you dont go by the guidelines of your > package manager, this kind of thing will happen in almost any package > manager. > > rpm doesnt give a problem while apt does because of the very reason that > apt is superior to rpm. apt tries to keep a sane apckage lit on your > system with all dependencies satisfied. RPM is content to cehck > dependencies on a pckage only when you try to install it. IT doesnt work > on the whole package set. > > If you really want to keep using apt, then you have to do as it says > "apt-get -f install" - so that your package database is sane again. > > Else, if all you want to do is install qt, download the rpm and install > it using standard RPM. > > Ofcourse in that case, you will get messages like "kdexxx depends on > qt-oldxx", and then "some other appxxx" depends on "kdexxx", and so an > and so forth till you are perfectly convinced to jump out of your > balcony. ;) > > apt does give you scope for hacks - for example, if you have installed > something using tar.gz and want it to be available as a "provides" > dependency, you can use the Fake-Provides hack in apt.conf. > > But generally, you need to play with the rules of apt if you want to use it. > > - Sandip > > -- > Sandip Bhattacharya > sandip (at) puroga.com > Puroga Technologies Pvt. Ltd. > Work: http://www.puroga.com Home: http://www.sandipb.net > > GPG: 51A4 6C57 4BC6 8C82 6A65 AE78 B1A1 2280 A129 0FF3 > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 12:51:39 +0530 > From: "avnathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [ilugd] LTSP - What is this beast > To: "The Linux-Delhi mailing list"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > As regards thin clients many people are pessimistic about it. Further, among > dedicated windows terminals, the linux ones apparently inferior in technology when > compared to the Windows-based ones as i read from a review. I am not sure thin > clients can work well for CAD/CAM and 3-D environments.Indiatimes Email now powered > by APIC Advantage. Help! > HelpClick on the image to chat with me > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 14:26:50 +0530 > From: LinuxLingam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [ilugd] LTSP - What is this beast > To: avnathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, The Linux-Delhi mailing list > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 12:51, avnathan wrote: > > As regards thin clients many people are pessimistic about it. Further, among > > dedicated windows terminals, the linux ones apparently inferior in technology when > > compared to the Windows-based ones as i read from a review. I am not sure thin > > clients can work well for CAD/CAM and 3-D environments.Indiatimes Email now > > powered by APIC Advantage. Help! > > HelpClick on the image to chat with me > > ok! you are kidding right! just thought would be a nice way to spend a > quiet sunday afternoon by starting a flame war. nice try. > but sudev, sandip, i, and a whole lot of people will let it pass. > > [sound of screeching flame-torches heard overhead as they harmlessly > miss their mark and fall into a cool, extinguishing, flowing river] > > but just for the record, could you furnish us with the following two: > > 1) reference, examples, of 'many' people who are pessimistic. > 2) the seemingly uninformed 'review' that you read. > > also, do note that CAD/CAM as a category has no direct substitute for > autocad for the moment. this due to several non-technical reasons. > however, that has nothing to do with thin-clients. you are mixing two > unrelated issues here. > > on the other hand, 2d and 3d graphics are processed with incredible > brute-force, thanks to the concept of clustering. hollywood works on > gnuLinux. > > enjoy your sunday. > > :-) > LL > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:21:56 +0530 > From: Ankit khare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [ilugd] TCPA? get worried > To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed > > LinuxLingam wrote: > > wonder how many of you are aware of this? its impact on linux will be > > significant to say the least. > TCPA , as it stands today , is totally OS agnostic. Your fear is > dictated by a tangential and inept understanding of TCPA . > > I hope this will clear your thoughts. > > http://www.research.ibm.com/gsal/tcpa/ > > Most of the arguments presented against TCPA at antitcpa.com stem from > the fact that TCPA has been interchangebly used/confused with Palladium > (M$'s initiative for Trusted Computing ) and DRM. DRM is just one of the > things TCPA hardware allows you to do. Please also refer to the above > link for an informed rebuttal of antitcpa.com and alike. > > Other Links of Interest. > > Linus on DRM . http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/03/04/24/1312231.shtml?tid=106 > > Perfectly good Howto on using TCPA Hardware under linux. > http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=6633 > > A response from a TCPA module manufacturer > http://llug.linux.ab.ca/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=13 > > the parallel thread on battling spam at > > linux-delhi looks pale by comparison. guys, we do need to do something. > > > It was nice to see ilugd community focusing on more pertinent issues > like spam. > > > http://www.againsttcpa.com/what-is-tcpa.html > > > I am pretty amazed to see people being "post happy". Posting an "I am > feeling Lucky " link without corroborating with substantiative > information or sufficient analysis is , in my NSHO ,Criminal Negligence. > > > LL > > > > > Ankit. > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:32:46 +0530 > From: LinuxLingam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [ilugd] apt-get > To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 10:55, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote: > > > One too many forced RPM install made. :) > > and several more things that RPM doesn't know about, either. ;-) > this because that's just the way things are when you work with different > types of source files. > > my system went into this state especially after i did some brute-force > installations for things like dvd playback, running videolan, some 3d > apps, etc. > > > > You have to make up your mind while maintainng your system. > > hindsight is nice. > > > > > Are you going to let your package manager manage your software, or are > > you going to do it yourself? If you dont go by the guidelines of your > > package manager, this kind of thing will happen in almost any package > > manager. > > > you just can't avoid doing manual tweaks at times > > also, i think it is easier to get out dep hell by just upgrading to a > new distro. > ;-) > LL > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 21:21:36 +0530 > From: Sharninder Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [ilugd] test ... please ignore > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 10:36:53 GMT > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [ilugd] Fedora Core 1 hangs on set hostname > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > nstalled Fedora Core 1 from LFY CD. Install went fine. However each time it boots > up it hangs at ``Setting the hostname''. > > I have 2 ethernet cards in this system. Both were recognised when I installed. > > Any tips why this is happening? > > -- Vaibhav > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:12:20 +0530 > From: Raj Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [ilugd] test ... please ignore > To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > >>>>> "Sharninder" == Sharninder Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Did we pass? > > -- Raju > -- > Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kandalaya.org/ > GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F > It is the mind that moves > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:16:35 +0530 > From: Abhijit Menon-Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [ilugd] Re: test ... please ignore > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > At 2004-03-14 16:12:20 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Did we pass? > > No, you were supposed to ignore the message. > > -- ams > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 06:36:39 -0600 > From: Nishikant Kapoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [ilugd] [Fwd: ILUG-D: 802.11x networks in India, Unlicensed?] > To: ILUG-D Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: ILUG-D: 802.11x networks in India, Unlicensed? > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Message from Mark O'Sullivan: > > Dear LugD, > > I'm currently working on some Open Source advocacy projects in Tilonia, > Rajasthan at the Barefoot College ( http://www.barefootcollege.org/ ). > I've been suggesting that a Wi-Fi network would be very advantageous to > the work that they do here, both locally on the campus and with the > potential to carry network facilites to a wide area. > > I know that in the EU the 802.11x signal is in the unlicensed spectrum. > Is this so in India also, or do you require a license to set one up here? > > Also, do you know of any instlled networks of this type in India? > > thanks, > > Mark O'Sullivan > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 06:37:36 -0600 > From: Nishikant Kapoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [ilugd] [Fwd: ILUG-D: monthly_meet] > To: ILUG-D Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: ILUG-D: monthly_meet > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Message from Rishi Kalia: > > there should be a monthly meet of the members & projects should be > allocated to different groups based upon interests. > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 12 > Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 04:45:48 -0800 (PST) > From: vivek khurana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [ilugd] LTSP - What is this beast > To: avnathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, The Linux-Delhi mailing list > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > --- avnathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As regards thin clients many people are pessimistic > > about it. Further, among dedicated windows > > terminals, the linux ones apparently inferior in > > technology when compared to the Windows-based ones > > as i read from a review. I am not sure thin clients > > can work well for CAD/CAM and 3-D > > environments.Indiatimes Email now powered by APIC > > Advantage. Help! > > HelpClick on the image to chat with me > > Are u jokin, send the pessimist ppl to me, i will > show what linux can do. > > As for thin clients they do work properly in such > environment. I know a companies which have CAD package > on linux providing same functionality and looks as > there windows version, but unfortunately none is > selling linux version in our country. > > Btw, which review says linux terminals are inferior > to windows can you point us to that review. May be you > have read any 4-5 year old review. > > regards > vivek > > ===== > Disclamer > The facts expressed here belong to everybody, the opinions to me. The distinction is > yours to draw... > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam > http://mail.yahoo.com > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 13 > Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 00:13:47 +0530 > From: Sharninder Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [ilugd] Re: test ... please ignore > To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:16:35 +0530 > Abhijit Menon-Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > At 2004-03-14 16:12:20 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > Did we pass? > > > > No, you were supposed to ignore the message. > > > > yes, You were supposed to give it a pass. Sorry, for hogging your bandwidth people, > I was just testing if the filters I have set in my mail client (sylpheed) are > working fine. I'm using sylpheed for the first time today. > > Regards > Sharninder > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > ilugd mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd > > End of ilugd Digest, Vol 12, Issue 30 > ************************************* _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
