On Mon, 2004-05-31 at 07:50, Raj Mathur wrote: [SNIP] > 1. Only people who've had extensive experience with a piece of > software should be speaking on it. There's just no point in giving a > top-level overview of the software and not being able to answer > questions that the audience throws up. So, for instance, Sudev on CAD > and our ``resident TeX experts'' on TeX/LaTeX would be cool, since > both parties have had oodles of experience with the softwares under > discussion. Additional similar speakers would be welcome. No oodles of experience here, so all I will give in is a "top" level intro. "De"-consider me for this occasion. If nothing else only then I will work to build a demo.
> > 3. Have a formal presentation (in whatever format) sent to the Meet > coordinators at least one week before the Meet. ILUGD meetings are > flexible enough to accommodate dynamic audience interests, but we tend > to wander too much when there's no fixed structure for a presentation. This is a cool idea. This will also build up repository of presentations that members can refer to later on the ILUG-D web-site. Not to take credit but is what I did for LTSP demo, albeit post the meet. -- Sudev Barar Learning Linux _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
