Works like books, documentation, fonts etc. can be offered either under GPL/FDL or Creative Commons.
I wanted your advice on this - if someone offers to release fonts, would you prefer it to be under CC or under GPL? What about books? Many people are releasing them under either FDL or CC. How would you take a decision in this case? Personally, I find CC licences to be more flexible, and more to the point about its purpose. What do you think? I am trying to build up a case in asking certain organizations to release some of their work to the commons. While I have zeroed in on CC licences, I would like to know more about arguments of the other side. - Sandip -- Sandip Bhattacharya | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Puroga Technologies Pvt. Ltd. | http://www.puroga.com GPG/PGP Fingerprint: 51A4 6C57 4BC6 8C82 6A65 AE78 B1A1 2280 A129 0FF3 _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- [email protected] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
