-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>>>>> "Sandip" == Sandip Bhattacharya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sandip> Raj Mathur wrote:
>> AFAIR RH specifies that you lose your service contract if you
>> redistribute their software or use it on systems for which it
>> is not licensed. So if you're willing to not have RH service
>> you are welcome to redistribute RHEL.
Sandip> Hmm. So does that mean that it is ok to buy a single copy
Sandip> of RHEL, and use it throughout the office, and keeping
Sandip> your apt/yum repositories pointing to whitebox/taolinux?
I doubt it :)
Perhaps the RH people on this list could (unofficially) clarify? If
you don't want to specify the legal position on the list, please send
me a personal mail and I can cut and paste from that without having to
specify name/designation in an informal message.
Regards,
- -- Raju
- --
Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kandalaya.org/
GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F
It is the mind that moves
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQFCdeakyWjQ78xo0X8RAkqEAKCKQepqK+dPUTMPtzSRUaAnqcUcSACfZ+VN
yeEQ8Tpcb8wtOmmWPV5Y2NQ=
=RUCy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
ilugd mailinglist -- [email protected]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
