On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 15:27 +0530, rahul wrote: > But... we had explained that the list we had sent to you were names of > people who we had contacted to: > 1. ask them if they were interested to speak at LinuxAsia > 2. inform them that if they were intrested, they were to share their topics > and titles of possible presentations, which we would then have reviewed with > the entire panel > > the only exceptions were 5-6 speakers (ex: the president) who were directly > invited, because they were to speak on day 1--i.e. the day that was directly > under our control. > > and once we did this exercise, we sent the list to ILUG-D to keep it > updated, so that there was no duplication in efforts. > > please do let us know what was incorrect in this approach. [...]
Hmm, that was not my impression at all, neither from the people on the ILUG-Delhi that the list was sent to (I only saw it second-hand), nor from other people outside ILUG-Delhi. For example, I talked with people from the NRCF, who also viewed the list as a finalised one. Also, by the time the list was being circulated, it was already rather close to the LA2007 dates. Rather than go on and on about you said this, and I said that, if there was a genuine mis-communication, let us take it up off-line, but, at least for the moment, I stand by what I said. Regards, Gora _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- [email protected] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
