-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 08 February 2007 00:30, Anupam Jain wrote: > [snip] > I liked ILUGD better when it wasn't committee-ised and decisions > were not taken by individuals for the whole LUG. The freedom to > fork is good but not the decision to do so on the slightest of > provocation. It's not prudent to fragment the community like this.
All the meetings that we had regarding participation in LA 2007 were announced on the list, and everyone was welcome to participate. Yes, decisions were taken by individuals, but ultimately all decisions are, aren't they? In this particular case, the individuals were the ones who bothered to come to the meetings. Considering we're one of the few (only?) LUGs in India that has bothered to register itself as a society and setup a democratic organisation, your comments and conclusions are completely wrong. If anyone wants to discuss issues with the ILUGD structure outside the LA frame, please start a new thread. Regards, - -- Raju - -- Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kandalaya.org/ GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F It is the mind that moves -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFyptOyWjQ78xo0X8RAg6yAJ9pID8DSAvrpLu3pnKTo5nQJJrZYgCdFU2D 4Gvywesbw8q5SutaEUD5ZcM= =75vS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
