-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [Starting a new thread]
On Thursday 08 February 2007 17:48, Anupam Jain wrote: > [snip] > You meant to be satirical but I think your suggestion is an > excellent one! Well during election times do you see people being > asked to come to Delhi and visit the Rashtrapati Bhavan in case > they want to be a part of the electoral process? Before taking any > decision, you do not take a decision and "inform" the members of > the same, you give the members the details of the situation and > "ask" for their opinion and continue to do so until some semblance > of a consensus on a possible course of action emerges. Especially > for ILUGD which started out as a mailing list, why have voting / > decision-making behind closed doors. It's not very difficult to > have an online voting setup, why don't we have that? There is no decision-making behind closed doors. Just because we didn't send a goddam chauffeur-driven limousine to your door to pick you up, bring you to the meetings that were announced on the list and solicit your valuable opinion doesn't mean that decisions were made behind closed doors, however much you may try to twist what everyone is saying to suit your own warped view of reality. I'd suggest you put up (substantiate what you're saying) or shut up; in other words, kindly shut up, since I can see no possible way you could manufacture any proof that ILUGD is acting in an undemocratic fashion. And yes, if you'd been present at the meeting you would have known that an online discussion and vote about participating in LA was considered and rejected since the time frames for making the decision were too short. For $deity's sake, it's been a week since the event and we're still discussing whether MS participation is a good thing or not -- what makes you think that an online discussion and vote with one day to make a decision would have been at all effective? That decision was made with the members present and I will stand behind that decision until the end -- if you weren't present for whatever reason you have no right to whine about it later. Anupam, I strongly suggest you stick to your points on MS participation and leave your views about ILUGD functioning out of the discussion since you only seem to be convincing people further and further of your stupidity every time you open your mouth on that subject. - -- Raju - -- Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kandalaya.org/ GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F It is the mind that moves -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFyynMyWjQ78xo0X8RAsQUAJ9Xjx7YxSYIhr88SoZkjSYEyF9OJwCaAyhC bmZvPIE9K8Ptqby0W+/5NPQ= =tyak -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
