Linux Lingam wrote: > however, in the grander scheme of things and of context, we prefer > discussing artworks that are based on foss-values. having said that, > must point out that not all creativecommons licenses are based on foss > values, but at least you can be forewarned and you may filter > accordingly. creativecommons form one part of the larger ecosystem.
Could you point me to some good references which discusses the issues FOSS purists find with Creative Commons, and which you find convincing enough? BTW, loads of high quality CC licenced photos available on Flickr can be used with just an Attribution. AFAIK, search engines like Yahoo , Google and a few others provide options to look just for creative commons content. ( Take a look at http://search.creativecommons.org/) As far as non-"freeware" royalty free content is concerned it would probably be better to stick to Creative Commons related resources, as alternative FOSS licences are both not as popular and neither as unambiguous. Just my point of view. - Sandip _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- [email protected] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Next Event: http://freed.in - February 22/23, 2008 Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
