Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: > if you mean that one cannot keep a wiki spam free if one allows non- > logged-in users to post, explain these:
If you are willing to volunteer to keep an eye on every edit and keep it spam-free, then ofcourse we can do that(the prominent ones you mentioned have dedicated teams looking at this). Else, this is probably a decision made by the admin keeping in the mind the ratio of maintenance overheads vs actual number of moderators for the wiki. I don't know about your wiki, but I have had enough of my share of administrating public wikis, and I am ok with the loss of privacy that you are probably concerned with. BTW, wikipedia has had its share of problems and had some time back tightened its editing rules. http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Press_releases/Wikipedia_tightens_editorial_control - Sandip _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- [email protected] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Next Event: http://freed.in - February 22/23, 2008 Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
