-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Naresh Narang writes: > Hi there,
> Wondering if anyone has compared performance difference between Apache > compiled with DSO support vs. compiled into one monolithic > binary. Which performs better? Monolithic one, will be faster, in my opinion, due to static linking of modules, and absence of trampolines. Though, I've never tried to measure this. Ashish - -- ·-- ·- ···· ·--- ·- ···- ·- ·--·-· --· -- ·- ·· ·-·· ·-·-·- -·-· --- -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against HTML e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkjHbwoACgkQHy+EEHYuXnTemwCgkvn2wmxsSdgz23sExkZjXOkJ sPEAoIBt5uHCAzSc6IrK5DZhv5Rx73pH =T6sz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- [email protected] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
