+1 Sandip,
----------------
Following are not my thoughts, if you read about the issue,, you can find
them them somewhere. But I strongly believe in these lines.
---------------

*    If you go to the fact and figure (As Venky told in meeting) , revenue
goes in the hand of inventor is very fraction of total revenue generated by
company using suing that patent. So how does in help to a inventor.
*   Nobody learn from teacher of moon or venus, or came with huge knowledge
from birth. We learn/share/buy knowledge from each other , we use
extensively pre-existing knowledge/tool to add and "++" kind of thing in
current system, so We do not have right to patent that small "++" kind of
object.
*   Patents are intended for monopoly. Monopoly is always harmful.
*   A company can make product without even getting patents. for software
you always have protection mechanism which is sufficient. What type of
protection M$ want ?? they got patent in page up /page down.. (
http://v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=US7415666&QPN=US7415666 )
So, it means everybody has to pay to M$ for integrating innovative page up
and page down method to their application. It also means, for a start-up
like me , who just want to develop some applications and sell will have to
go through all all patents and then decide which patent I am conflicting.
     Tell me one start-up who got benefit of patents,, Even if somebody got
a patents, Big company always sue them for some other patent infringement
and make a MoU by which now big company has one more patent in his list.

* One of the reputed VC said "patents are like nuclear bombs"

* This issue came with rightmost and then software, and now it came with
"software over embedded hardware as one unit" and I predict that it will
come again with "VHDL IP Cores based Systems",  where their is no hardware
exist. Everything is software. You can generated (using coding) any type of
hardware over a generic programmable platform and updates and install new
patches. You can download and install latest processors, etc. Better to
start working in this issue also. as I have seen the progress of Xilinx and
other companies and their technologies, soon we will be having such hardware
in our hands, their , these companies has chance to rule/monopoly like M$
etc. Till now I have not observed such issue but it will face it near
future. So Lets finish it this instance only.
_______________________________________________
ilugd mailinglist -- [email protected]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to