On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Raj Mathur <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Friday 10 Apr 2009, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Raj Mathur <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> > The characters are all here, because if you select and copy the PDF
>> > text (e.g. in Kpdf) and paste it into an editor it displays the
>> > complete Urdu text beautifully.
>>
>> If you use the same font to write something in a standard editor/word
>> processor and output it to PDF, does it render b0rked or as_expected?
>
> Interesting diagnostic!  Yes, if I paste the text from the PDF into OOo
> writer, convert all to Nafees font and generate a fresh PDF it looks
> just fine.

Umm.. I was looking at whether - if you use a new OOo writer document
and, with the same font selected input randomly using appropriate
layout whether it gets rendered.

> Maybe I should get Joomla to just use OOo to generate PDFs from pages
> (j/k :)

Well, on the face of it, turns out that Joomla seems to be pushing out
a PDF that does not seem to render alright. Might be worth poking at
the internals to see how Joomla does generate the PDF. And, the
original post would be a good puzzle on indlinux list :)

-- 

http://www.gutenberg.net - Fine literature digitally re-published
http://www.plos.org - Public Library of Science
http://www.creativecommons.org - Flexible copyright for creative work
Sent from Mumbai, MH, India

_______________________________________________
ilugd mailinglist -- [email protected]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to