On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Kishore Bhargava <[email protected]> wrote: > On 19/11/09 19:06, Andrew Lynn wrote: >> >> I have a problem of accommodating a large increase in the number of >> users on my LAN, without proper planning at the level of the router. >> The router now has a throttle of around 50%! >> Fortunately, in our times of excess, we had not implemented >> web-caching. This, I hope, could be the short-term answer to serving >> the users on the LAN and reducing throttle. >> >> For administrative issues, it is best if squid is implemented as a >> transparent cache. Most info on the net has squid sitting on the >> router, and is transparent only to the client. Since content filtering >> etc, is provided through a UTM box - Cyberoam - I need squid to be >> transparent to both client and web-server. TPROXY promises such a >> feature. <snip> > AFAIK, Cyberroam actually has a proxy module and can be set for both > transparent or otherwise. Its in the interface options of Cyberoam. You may > just want to stick with that rather than introduce a new box/service.
Nope. New versions of Cyberoam have removed support for (Squid)/caching in the box - probably because the cache was eating up the small disk on board. They have recently introduced a great logging/reporting solution called Cyberoam iview[1] which can link Squid, Syslog and Cyberoam or other UTMs like Sonicwall. But ... that does not solve my problem :( Andrew [1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/cyberoam-iview/ http://www.cyberoam-iview.org/ -- Freed.in : Freedom in technology and software _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- [email protected] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
