On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:15:11 +0530 Raj Mathur <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Gora Mohanty <[email protected]> > wrote: [...] > > Legal eagles can chip in, but roughly speaking, copyright has > > to do with ownership, while a licence has to do with what terms > > and conditions that you allow other people to use things under. > > Not a legal (or any other specie, genus or phylum) of eagle, but > technically you may own copyright to a work without having the > rights to license it. For instance, when you write a book, the > copyright vests with you but the licence to redistribute is with > the publisher. [...] I thought that issues like exclusive redistribution rights for the publisher came through a contract signed between the author and the publisher, but again could be wrong. How about a legal beagle, if not an eagle. Or, maybe an illegal eagle. Ki gal hai, pappe? Regards, Gora _______________________________________________ Ilugd mailing list [email protected] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
