2010/6/21 Raj Mathur (राज माथुर) <[email protected]>
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > Thanks for sharing the link. From the above linked page: > If the Reply-To is munged by the mailing list, the value provided by the > original sender is lost. Reply-To munging can make it impossible to reach > the sender of a message. > and > Principle of Least Damage seem to me the most important things to not use the reply-to munging feature. Principle of Least Surprise I was actually surprised to know the message I sent was not delivered to the list but to the author only. But that's only because I was used to other lists which have the reply-to header set to the list (I guess most of them are google groups) > Most mail clients today have a "Reply to list" option, why not just use > that? > I mostly use gmail's web interface and it doesn't have that. Besides I always thought what's the use of sending two mails to author - one in the list and one privately - if I used "reply-to-all" option. -- Kartik Singhal BTech CSE Student, NIT Calicut http://www.techglider.com _______________________________________________ Ilugd mailing list [email protected] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
