On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 08:57:03 -0500 Kumar Appaiah <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 01:09:29PM +0530, H.S.Rai wrote: > > During 2002, I used to use Pine, and while experts were used to > > use Mutt. Now Pine has been mobed to Alpine (and abandoned). [...] Ooh! Command-line email clients wars! Almost as good as emacs vs. vi. Besides the suggested answers, the one that I always liked was mh (which has now become nmh, and there is a package for it in at least Debian, and Ubuntu). The nice thing about nmh is that it is not a single client that requires you to enter a separate interface, but a collection of programs that lets you work with mail in between other command-line work. Not sure if mutt, or the other alternatives do that. The only reason that they pried nmh out of my cold, (not-yet) dead fingers was the increasing prevalence of attachments in mail, and some setup issues. Regards, Gora _______________________________________________ Ilugd mailing list [email protected] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
