On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Raj Mathur (राज माथुर) <[email protected] > wrote:
> > If it's an option, switch to an RDBMS that was designed for enterprise- > class deployment from day 1, i.e. an RDBMS that doesn't have "My" in the > name. > > Yeah, I know this is going to start another flame war but WTH, Delhi's > getting colder by the day. I'm planning to install a few old computers > around slum clusters, at least the heat generated on the list will keep > them warm at nights! > > Regards, > > Well i have created one more index on the respective table and have created partitions on the table based on date range. This has increased the performance by 50% for now but it's very scary as table is recording approx 1 lack rows per day so i am switching to MongoDB now with sharding. @Tarun, Thanks I will try Apache Solr. BTW just to ask why did Google, Facebook didn't switch to Mongo DB if it's that difficult in MySql? I have seen so many big applications are still running and being developed on My Sql. -- Regards RAKESH KUMAR http://raakeshkumar.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Ilugd mailing list [email protected] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
