>>>>> "Ambar" == Ambar Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It Looks that most of the people are ignoring a very important
>> that it is
Ambar> the amount of I/O with a DBMS is doing. If for the same
Ambar> type of repeated operations i.e. adding of UNIQUE records
Ambar> to a table with few lakh records is to be done then the
Ambar> faster DBMS is the one which will require lesser I/O
Ambar> operations. And in my view Oracle is much faster because of
Ambar> better disk caching it employs and I hope that this is the
Ambar> most important factor.
Also don't forget Oracle can use raw disk partitions, which means it
avoids the OS filesystem overhead altogether. I think this is true of
newer versions of Oracle also.
Regards,
-- Raju
--
Raju Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kandalaya.org/
It is the mind that moves
================================================
To subscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subscribe in subject header
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in subject header
Archives are available at http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd%40wpaa.org
=================================================
