Here goes distro wars again. ;) On 08/12/02 23:56 +0530, Gollum thus spake: > this is good new man. I love debian. I had it once on my system. but then I > could'nt get my printer to work, neiter did i get half the things to work. > But Debian is beautyful in many ways. it does not have a f up kernel like > redhat has. And though configuration is difficult it is a great sense of > achivement for "me" type users just to get X server to work. Actually i > copied the conf file of redhat to debian to make it work. I loved it. Now I > hope they really do something of the installer. it really needed a makeover. > the old installer is damn confusing. But as they say "it's evolution
Lets see, 1. In debian you cant get half the things to work. 2. Redhat has a more f*** up kernel than debian. Care to elaborate? 3. In debian, users have to achieve getting X to work. 4. In debian, the installer is confusing. So why are you using Debian instead of Redhat? One reason that many give is apt. That cant be all. Can someone enlighten me? Is it just because RH is a commercial entity? Is it just because of that GNU concept of freedom is more important than quality? ;) - Sandip -- -------------------------------------------------------- Sandip Bhattacharya sandipb <@> bigfoot.com http://www.sandipb.net GPG/PGP: 0x08EB637C -------------------------------------------------------- ================================================ To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in subject header. Check archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd%40wpaa.org
