I dont think winbind is a good idea...
 
What I understand is FTP users requiers a userid , groupid and home-directory 
 
you have to look out for a way by which you can do a AD user login into the FTP 
server 
without modifying any options on the AD.
 
 
the drawback with winbind or Kerberose is it requires a uid, gid and hd  , and 
also it needs a user to be conigured as a Posix account on the AD. if windows 
is installed already then it is no use as windows AD should have 
been configured with a support to lower version.
 
 
I think the best would be           vsftpd user + pam + openldap client  =  AD
if you could get this running or a solution similar to this , then there is 
nothing like it.
-- not sure  just a thought
 
or else they could be some other way. 
 
Prasad
 
 


--- On Tue, 7/15/08, Ashok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

From: Ashok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [TwinCLinG] VSFTPD+Open LDAP
To: [email protected]
Date: Tuesday, July 15, 2008, 6:56 AM






I would not suggest winbind,  as winbind's cache is not so consistent, again  
you have to use rid or ldap backend,  to have a good scalable backend

though i guess , we have tdb backend also, but the winbind procedure, is to 
join the RHEL system on which you want to run ftp server is pretty straight 
forward. 

Since i am not aware of which distribution you have,  but if you are using 
fedora, rhel5,  centos or some thing like that then run 
1. authconfig-tui (text mode)
2. specify Winbind as your User and authentication 
3. Specify REALM (which is DOMAIN in CAPS),  AD server ip address and AD 
server's hostname, 

4. Run command "net ads join -U administrator" 

sorry for small howto, but if you go through samba.org , you should find a good 
documentation on this, and also it is pretty straight forward. 

if you are using SUSE, then  you have nice gui tools , not sure what's the 
name, but it's pretty straight forward. 

Regards
Niranjan

--- On Mon, 7/14/08, G.David Manohar <david_manohar@ yahoo.com> wrote:
From: G.David Manohar <david_manohar@ yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [TwinCLinG] VSFTPD+Open LDAP
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .com
Date: Monday, July 14, 2008, 7:17 PM

Hi Niranjan,

I am working on similar lines... could you please update me w.r.t 

winbind also...

As the AD users are already created, I would not be able to do any 

changes to those accounts...

Regards,

David

--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] .com, Ashok <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ..> wrote:

>

> Hi David, 

> 

> I want to know, if you want , How to configure Vsftpd to 

authenticate using AD users / Or OpenLDAP, 

> 

> Can you clarify more. 

> 

> Configuring vsftpd with OpenLDAP , is configuring the vsftpd 

system to authenticate to LDAP server, and nothing to do with vsftpd, 

as vsftp will call pam 

> and appropriate LDAP libararies will be called. 

> 

> So configure an LDAP Server, using OpenLDAP, You will find a lot of 

howto's on that in google. 

> 

> Here is a few

> http://kbase. redhat.com/ faq/FAQ_91_ 11441.shtm

> 

> So once system is configured to authenticate OpenLDAP, vsftpd can 

use PAM to get LDAP user. 

> 

> 

> If you want Vsftpd to authenticate using AD user. For that, vsftpd 

server should authenticate to AD using LDAP and kerberos (is one 

option) or you use Winbind as another option. Using LDAP and 

kerberos to Authenticate to Windows AD is better option. 

> 

> Regards

> Niranjan

> 

> --- On Fri, 7/11/08, G.David Manohar <david_manohar@ ...> wrote:

> From: G.David Manohar <david_manohar@ ...>

> Subject: [TwinCLinG] VSFTPD+Open LDAP

> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .com

> Date: Friday, July 11, 2008, 11:36 AM

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> Hi,

> 

> 

> 

> Can someone please help me configuring VSFTPD with OPEN-LDAP to 

access 

> 

> active directory.

> 

> 

> 

> Thanks in advance...

> 

> 

> 

> David

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>











[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 














      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to