The Price for Leopard is what, $199.00 and Vista Home Premium is about 
$349.00.  Usually Mac software is much less expensive, so for a cost 
effective, long term commitment stick with the iMac.  Also, I being energy 
efficient like the iMac since it is smaller than a P.C. desktop and it takes 
less energy and resources to make.   If you purchase PC desktop's you will 
be looking at a lot more inconvenience when fixing them too.

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Charles Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 5:45 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: iMac purchase justifications

>
> External security in connection to the INTERNET is THE Biggie!!!!
>
> I'm certain that you can find other 'Church Offices' in your area,
> that are 'Wintel/Microsoft' operations. It shouldn't take much in the
> way of conversation to expose 'Horror Stories'.
>
> Then there is always the 'If it ain't broke, Don't FIX it' line.
>
> Chuck D.
>
> On Sep 18, 2008, at 5:16 PM, Ramon Tate wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi, all,
>> As a long-time reader of this list, I know there are a number of you
>> out there who tend multiple computer installations, including mixed
>> Mac
>> and MS-based PC ones. I would like some justifications/talking points
>> to bolster my view that for a small (3-4 computer) church office,
>> staying with our all-Mac installation is cost-effective as we are
>> being
>> pushed to replace them all with Windows systems. Currently, we have an
>> old 700 MHz G3 (OS 10.3.9) iMac, a 1.25 GHz eMac (OS 10.3.9), and a
>> 2-yr-old 1.5 GHz 15" Powerbook (OS 10.4.11), all on a CAT5e LAN via a
>> 5-port switch, an 802.11g 4-port wireless router (running wrt
>> firmware)
>> and a Comcast-supplied cable modem. Most of what we do is word
>> processing and document production for church programs, as well as the
>> usual Internet connectivity things like email and web access. All
>> systems have MS Office 2004 and Filemaker 7.1 - we use the latter
>> for a
>> variety of database functions such as purchase order tracking, etc.
>> The
>> eMac also has Virtual PC installed that is used to run an OLD Windows
>> 98 calendar program that we like.
>>
>> My stance, being the one who set most of this up about 4-5 years ago,
>> is that we (a) don't have anyone to watch over an office LAN all the
>> time as needed for a Windows-based environment, (b) we couldn't afford
>> it if we did and there is no one in the church who can do it gratis,
>> (c) replacing all the Office and Filemaker software would be extremely
>> expensive, and (d) the inevitable decline in security would result
>> in a
>> major breach in short order. I would much prefer to buy 3 new iMacs
>> (will need another for a new staff member) and upgrade the
>> Powerbook to
>> Leopard, keeping all the existing software and/or upgrading as
>> required
>> (already have FM 9 ready to go).
>>
>> So, experts, what say you?
>> (and thanks in advance for your sage advice)
>>
>> Ramon Tate
>> Rockville, Maryland
>>
>>
>> >
>
>
> > 

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to Low End Mac's iMac 
List, a group for those using G3, G4, G5, and Intel Core iMacs as well as Apple 
eMacs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/imac/list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/imaclist?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to