At 9:07 AM -0700 4/8/2009, Bruce Johnson wrote:
>On Apr 8, 2009, at 7:30 AM, Dan wrote:
>  > At 4:43 AM -0700 4/8/2009, Bill Spencer wrote:
>>>  http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/09/technology/companies/09apple.html
>>
>>  sigh. Yet-another reason to overhaul the patent system.
>
>Why?
>
>I know this is the knee-jerk reaction any time a patent case comes 
>up to court, but there's nothing in this article to indicate that 
>this is anything other than a bona-fide patent infringement case 
>instead of a submarine patent lawsuit abuse.

The international patent "system" is untenable.  Because of treaties 
and such, you have to honour patents world-wide but you cannot do a 
truly complete search.  It's a situation that the lawyers love, as it 
creates thousands of unnecessary lawsuits every year.

- Dan.
-- 
- Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to Low End Mac's iMac 
List, a group for those using G3, G4, G5, and Intel Core iMacs as well as Apple 
eMacs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/imac/list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/imaclist?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to