Slight correction. An imap email account will not look like the only machine accessing email.Then get an iPhone from eBay, unlock it
Sent from my eyeFone On Sep 6, 2009, at 6:56 PM, Ryan Waldon <[email protected]> wrote: > > AT&T is the reason why I don't have an iPhone. Based on my usage of > and experience with my iPod Touch, I'm quite sure I would love the > iPhone's hardware and interface. But I'm not willing to downgrade both > my wireless connectivity and customer service by going from Sprint to > AT&T... > > --ryan > > Sent from my iPod Touch > > On Sep 6, 2009, at 12:31, "Dennis B. Swaney" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Elliott Price wrote: >>> Yup, that about sums it up. Apple figures that if you never bought >>> Leopard, then you never paid the $130 for it, and therefore should >>> buy >>> the way more expensive Box set Snow Leopard. >>> It'll upgrade Tiger anyways, though, so I don't know how they're >>> going >>> to enforce this... >>> >> >> The "box set" is a ripoff because it contains software that I DON'T >> want; I should not be required to buy unwanted applications just to >> upgrade my operating system. Apple is the new Microsoft. >> >> -- >> Sincerely, >> Dennis B. Swaney >> >> "Windows is a command-line OS with a GUI shell while Mac System 10 is >> ... oh, never mind." >> >>> > > It will pick up whatever someone accessed last. So read messages on one machine will appear as read on the second machine. Sorry. Sent from my eyeFone On Sep 7, 2009, at 9:13 PM, Gary Fortman <[email protected]> wrote: > > This thread has gone on far too long. > Simply set both machines to "leave mail on the server". Whether they > are pop or imap will not matter. Each machine will look like it is the > only machine accessing email. > Forget server settings etc. > I have done this for several years with my mac at work and home. Works > perfectly. > > > > Sent from my eyeFone > > On Sep 7, 2009, at 8:51 PM, Bill Spencer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Sep 7, 9:27 am, "Dennis B. Swaney" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> What about setting one of the machines up as a server? >> >> >> Well, the trouble is that both machines have to be accessible as >> clients at all times, given the fact that three people need to have >> access to two machines at any one time. If I understand what makes a >> server a server, changing one to a server would mean three people >> trying to use one machine at any one time. Maybe I'm totally wrong >> about how servers work, but I don't think this will be a viable >> option... >> >> Bill >>> > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ > You received this message because you are a member of the iMac > Group, a group for those using Apple iMacs and eMacs. > The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/imac/list.shtml and our > netiquette guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/imaclist > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are a member of the iMac Group, a group for those using Apple iMacs and eMacs. The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/imac/list.shtml and our netiquette guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml To post to this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/imaclist -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
