Hi Chris, Chris MacKenzie wrote: > I am doing a vast amount of work in photoshop cs2 and then resizing > images into multiple sizes for email, web publication, printing out on > A3, A4 etc,etc. To date I have been using PhotoShop actions which is a > real pain. > > I have used PIL with python in a programming environment and am aware of > the power it gives. > > My Question is will resizing in PIL reduce the image quality compared to > CS2 or will it remain the same as the CS2 output.
The main differences (barring bugs/odd implementations) will be the different interpolation methods available to you. Just looking in CS2 the standard ones are : Nearest Neighbour Bilinear Bicubic Bicubic Smoother Bicubic Sharper You can also find a whole lot of discussion on the web about Photoshop actions that given better resizing, in particular 'Stair Interpolation' which is basically changing the size by small amounts and repeating until you reach the desired size. This will take a lot more CPU time, but is meant to give better results. eg http://www.fredmiranda.com/SI/ Looking at PIL and the resize function we have the following methods : NEAREST (use nearest neighbour), BILINEAR (linear interpolation in a 2x2 environment), BICUBIC (cubic spline interpolation in a 4x4 environment), or ANTIALIAS (a high-quality downsampling filter) I would expect that the first three should produce identical results to Photoshop, though there could be some variation to the implementation of the algorithm in some methods. You could confirm this and otherwise see how the other versions from the two compare. The main thing might be that python/PIL is perhaps a bit slower, but if you don't have too many images, or they aren't too big, and can easily script it to take less of your time, then you should win out on time. If desired you should be able to replicate the Stair Interpolation method within PIL fairly easily, I have done before, but can't find the code right now. A separate note on getting the best out of resizing for email/web is that it is a good idea to sharpen the image with an unsharp mask after it has been resized. This makes a very marked difference to the end result. If you have a search for "resize image unsharp" on google to find some further discussion. Here is one : http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/image-resize-for-web.htm This leaves PIL at a little bit of a disadvantage as there isn't a default unsharp mask in PIL, but there was a plugin/patch built for it! It was for an older version, but I think I had it working ok with at least 1.1.4, and probably wouldn't take much to get to work with 1.1.6 if it didn't work as is : See : http://www.cazabon.com/pyCMS/PIL_usm.html Hope this helps, JB. _______________________________________________ Image-SIG maillist - Image-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/image-sig
