> It might be nice to have another one for Python2.4 or Apple's Python, > but that's less critical.
As you say, we've discussed this before. I think the #1 priority should be an installer for PIL that works with the system Python, what Chris is calling Apple Python. That's what users have, pre-installed. For Python 2.3.5 (on OS X 10.4), and Python 2.5 (on OS X 10.5). And universal, so that it works on both Intel and PPC. (No, I don't know how to build a "universal" extension.) After that's in place, then an installer for the non-Apple Python distributed from python.org would also be a good thing. As for the rest, let them build from source. Bill _______________________________________________ Image-SIG maillist - Image-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/image-sig
