On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Charlie Clark <char...@begeistert.org> wrote: > > Am 19.03.2009 um 19:28 schrieb Cristi Constantin: > >> Thank you very much for your answers. >> I will wait for PIL 1.1.7 quietly. :) > > > While I think a lot of people would love to see a rapid migration to Python > 3, it is a lot of work for many libraries (anything written in C)
I see the issue other way around, it is more troublesome to update pure python code to 3.x than to port the C part. > and, > therefore, for the people who maintain them. In the meantime I think it is > reasonable to expect users to target Python 2.6 which should encourage more > Python 3.0 stuff without breaking important aspects of backward > compatability for many projects. > > Charlie > -- > Charlie Clark > Helmholtzstr. 20 > Düsseldorf > D- 40215 > Tel: +49-211-938-5360 > GSM: +49-178-782-6226 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Image-SIG maillist - image-...@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/image-sig > -- -- Guilherme H. Polo Goncalves _______________________________________________ Image-SIG maillist - Image-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/image-sig
