>>> import Image
>>> Image.VERSION
'1.1.6'
>>> N.__version__
'1.3.0'
>>> im=Image.open('Desktop/chart_bl.tif')
>>> im2= im.convert('L')
>>> a = N.asarray(im2)
>>> a.shape
(18710, 13228)
>>> a.dtype
uint8
>>> a.sum()
33087362820
>>> a = N.asarray(im)
>>> a.shape
(18710, 13228)
>>> a.dtype
bool
>>> a.sum()
<seg fault>$: uname -a Linux DebianMachine 2.6.30-1-amd64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 19 13:41:28 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux -S. On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Fredrik Lundh<fred...@pythonware.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Guy K. Kloss<g.kl...@massey.ac.nz> wrote: >> On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 22:57:42 you wrote: >>> Note that there's been some changes to the numpy interface in 1.1.7, >>> which was recently tagged for release, even though I haven't gotten >>> around to cut the tarballs just yet: >>> >>> http://hg.effbot.org/pil-2009-raclette/src/pil-117/ >> >> One of the biggest problems for the Linux community is, that (at least with >> Ubuntu) the realeases still feature 1.1.6. Also the upcoming Karmic (9.10) >> still features the 1.1.6 version, and I doubt it will be upgraded to 1.1.7 in >> time for release. I'd guess it's frozen already. So, we're going to face for >> almost another year these troubles of the 1.1.6 release out with the broad >> users of PIL. And I can understand the resistance to just go and install >> alternative versions versions past the package management on a broad number >> of >> systems (e. g. for universities). >> >> That's nothing against your efforts Fredrik, that's just an explanation why >> you/we will have to face more ongoing usage of outdated package versions. > > Sure, but it would still be interesting to know if the 1.1.7 changes > actually solves this specific problem, so we know if/how it can be > worked around or monkey patched. > _______________________________________________ Image-SIG maillist - Image-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/image-sig
