On 09-09-28, at 07:22, Fredrik Lundh wrote:

On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Etienne Desautels <t...@sympatico.ca> wrote:

So after experimenting, I see 3 problems:
1. Resize with ANTIALIAS from a large JPEG to a small thumbnail give poor
image quality.

This should work fine in 1.1.6; no time to look at your tests right
now, but I'll do that asap.

Since I wrote this, I resize (downsample) a lot more images with PIL and in general the result is excellent. The problem appear only with the kind of images I choose to do my initial tests, image of concentric circles or alike. Now I'm pretty sure that the poor result I saw is a special edge case of the antialias algorithm used in PIL. I can't see any other explanation.

2. BICUBIC, when set, is not applied. Instead NEAREST is use.

The problem you're seeing is that PIL's BICUBIC filter has a fixed
size, and thus doesn't work well for large downsamplings (there's a
discussion about this in the documentation, iirc).  The ANTIALIAS
filter does not have that shortcoming.

Ho, yes I see.

3. Converting from TIFF CMYK to RGB shift the colors dramatically.

This is a bug in 1.1.6 and earlier (well, strictly speaking, it's a
old bug in Photoshop, but I guess we're not really in a position to
make them change their implementation ;-).  It's fixed in 1.1.7.
There's also a drop-in replacement JPEG plugin by Kevin Cazabon that
fixes this for earlier versions (in a somewhat roundabout way, due to
a bug in the core library that has also been fixed in 1.1.7); see:

   http://mail.python.org/pipermail/image-sig/2006-April/003871.html

I saw some threads about this bug but I was with the impression that applied only to the JPEG plugin, not to the CMYK support in general ?

Etienne

</F>


_______________________________________________
Image-SIG maillist  -  Image-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/image-sig

Reply via email to