This sort of describes the situation I have just recently ran into. I wanted to fiddle with a wireless IP cam I picked up to monitor my driveway as the included software was garbage and decided to try Python as I had been wanting to learn it for sometime. Well 100 lines into my first real attempt at a python3 program I realized that I needed PIL and had to revert back to python2. I know asking for something like this to be converted is a tall tall order but as it seems to be in the works I just wanted to give it my +1 again
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 5:57 AM, joe oettinger <joeoettin...@gmail.com>wrote: > First, I'd like to say thanks to Fredrik Lundh and those working with him > for the huge and effective effort they've expended to establish and maintain > PIL. > > Second, that PIL for python 3.1 would be a wonderful advance. > > Personally, I just dabble in Python, but I've got an interesting story to > tell: > > My son, who writes software for TI, recently wanted to help his 10-year-old > learn to program. I suggested Python. He downloaded the latest version of > Python and bought "Python Programming for the Absolute Beginner" (which uses > PIL and Pygames). He's a very busy engineer. The kid is bright, but has many > other interests. As you will have guessed, they've postponed their project > for a while. > > I'm sure that lack of support libraries like PIL and numpy has slowed the > adoption of Python 3.x. I'd guess that the uncertainty about which version > to use has even slowed the overall adoption of Python by new users. > > Conversely, Python3.x with PIL and other support libraries would be > unbeatable - a beautiful intellectual achievement. > > Thanks again to Lundh et al for all their selfless work! > > Joe Oettinger > > _______________________________________________ > Image-SIG maillist - Image-SIG@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/image-sig > >
_______________________________________________ Image-SIG maillist - Image-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/image-sig