2010/6/5 Simon Mosk-Aoyama <simon...@gmail.com>: > Chris, > Thanks so much for the suggestion! > I ran the otool command and noted that the _imaging.so is linked to the > wrong (newer) libjpeg: > > simon@/Users/simon/: otool -L PIL/_imaging.so > PIL/_imaging.so: > /opt/local/lib/libjpeg.8.dylib (compatibility version 9.0.0, current > version 9.1.0) > /opt/local/lib/libz.1.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current > version 1.2.5) > /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current > version 125.0.1) > > so seems like I may have misconfigured setup.py.
According to my tests, PIL works just fine with libjpeg verions 7 and 8 (there's been a bit of version inflation over there lately :-). I guess you could get into trouble if you build with header files for libjpeg 6 and then link the result against libjpeg 7/8, but I have no idea if that's the case. </F> _______________________________________________ Image-SIG maillist - Image-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/image-sig