Thanks for the bug report Justin. I have filed a new ticket in our bug trac (code.imagej.net/trac/imagej/ticket/1165<http://code.imagej.net/trac/imagej/ticket/1152>). You are CCed on the ticket and should receive updates as this issue is addressed.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Senseney, Justin (NIH/CIT) [E] < [email protected]> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > > >Something related I noted some time ago. > >I find the smoothed ROIs a bit puzzling. Sure for deforming an ROI they > might be useful, but is it possible to see what is in and what is >not in > the ROI? > >Can one "draw" a pixel-accurate ROI this way? > > IJ1 handles this well, since straight lines are always connecting points, > so you're likely to have a range of pixel types that will complement each > other to provide an ROI that neither over-counts or under-counts the > pixels. It's a good question for curved ROIs if there's an algorithm that > can provide an efficient approach. I have not looked. > > Justin Senseney > BIRSS/ISL/DCB/CIT/NIH > 301-594-5887 > 301-480-0028 (fax) > Building 12A/2015 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ImageJ-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://imagej.net/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel >
_______________________________________________ ImageJ-devel mailing list [email protected] http://imagej.net/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel
