2012/6/1 Johannes Schindelin <[email protected]>: > Hi Curtis, > > On Fri, 1 Jun 2012, Curtis Rueden wrote: > >> There has been an increasing amount of discussion of ImgLib lately, >> which is great. However, the discussions have been spread across >> fiji-devel, imagej-devel and private mails. I noticed people have been >> adding an "[imglib]" or similar prefix to some mails, but not others. >> >> Would people prefer a dedicated imglib-devel mailing list? It would be >> easy to create one. It could live on imagej.net >> ([email protected]), or on Google Groups like fiji-devel does, or >> even [email protected] if the owner of that domain is willing to >> add an MX entry to imagej.net, similar to fiji.sc now (run "host >> fiji.sc" from the console to see what I mean). >> >> I think a dedicated mailing list would be good as people are >> increasingly using ImgLib2 in non-ImageJ contexts. >> >> Thoughts? > > Heh. I just sent a mail to fiji-users and imagej in the opposite > direction. > > I often see that discussions fail to reach the target audience because we > have too many mailing lists, not too few. Also, quite a few people get > dropped from discussions because the "Reply-to-all" button is too hard to > find. > > So I'd suggest not to split the lists even further. > > But I am pragmatic about it, if you really want to have another mailing > list, go for it. I'd suggest to use our own mail server. Google Groups > sound nice but have so many shortcomings and nobody fixing them. > > Ciao, > Dscho
I second Johannes. No benefits from splitting the mailing lists. Albert -- http://albert.rierol.net http://www.ini.uzh.ch/~acardona/ _______________________________________________ ImageJ-devel mailing list [email protected] http://imagej.net/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel
