Gabriel, I have also opened a ticket for this issue which can be followed here: http://code.imagej.net/trac/imagej/ticket/1367
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Barry DeZonia <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Gabriel, > > The current behavior could likely be improved. Can you provide me with an > example that I could use for testing where IJ1 opens few or no windows > while IJ2 opens many? > > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Gabriel Landini <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Not sure if this has been flagged before. >> When running an IJ1 plugin that creates an ImagePlus but it is not shown, >> the >> same plugin in IJ2 shows the image. >> >> Is this something that can be resolved? If not, it might be impossible or >> painfully slow to run IJ1 plugins that create a large number of temporary >> ImagePlus but are not shown to be processed and then closed. In IJ2 they >> are >> all shown making the whole process very slow. >> >> Cheers >> >> Gabriel >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ImageJ-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://imagej.net/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel >> > >
_______________________________________________ ImageJ-devel mailing list [email protected] http://imagej.net/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel
