2012/10/24 Johannes Schindelin <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > On Wed, 24 Oct 2012, Albert Cardona wrote: > >> 2012/10/23 Barry DeZonia <[email protected]>: >> >> > Thanks for the bug reports in regards to beta 5. I've entered them into our >> > bug database and we'll address them as soon as feasible. I've CCed you on >> > the relevant tickets. See (http://trac.imagej.net/ticket/1547) and >> > (http://trac.imagej.net/ticket/1548). > > Note that "IJ" in ImageJ2 scripting refers to the current ImageJ context, > i.e. an instance of imagej.ImageJ. It does *not* refer to the static class > ij.IJ -- which would not make too much sense anyway, because we are most > likely not able to support too many of that class' functions. > > Ciao, > Johannes
Johannes, the ij.jar is a jar and is included in ImageJ2. I understand it may be desirable to intercept some of its functionality such as IJ.log and redirect it, but other than that, being a jar, one would except beanshell and other scripting languages to load and use jars in the classpath as usual. Albert -- http://albert.rierol.net http://www.ini.uzh.ch/~acardona/ _______________________________________________ ImageJ-devel mailing list [email protected] http://imagej.net/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel
