Hi Curtis, >> It is quite hard to define the state of the program when you have to >> describe it in a scientific paper, because there aren't atomic >> versions easily accessible to users, which encapsulate the entire >> state of the IJ system. > > I agree completely, and filed ticket #1987 to record the need for this:
You could argue further that the JRE and maybe OS could have an influence too, and these might need to be at least logged somewhere. Glad to see the ticket, hopefully we will be able to contribute some engineer power to it from London. Michael _______________________________________________ ImageJ-devel mailing list ImageJ-devel@imagej.net http://imagej.net/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel
