Hi Curtis, On Fri, 18 Oct 2013, Curtis Rueden wrote:
> > So by removing the topic branches, we also removed the documentation > > from what source we used to build certain revisions of our bio-formats > > submodule. > > If you think this is a problem, I am fine with reinstating the branches. > I still have the local branch pointers and can easily push them back if > that's what you want. > > Personally I just thought the benefits of simplification outweighed > preserving such (minor) history. My thinking is that many more people will > be looking at the list of repos in those namespaces and potentially > wondering why we keep a fork of the project, versus the likely extremely > small number (potentially zero) of developers digging through the git > history and cross-checking against the given links, etc. I guess you're right and it is not really worth preserving because all of our changes basically made it back into the 'master' branch somehow. Ciao, Dscho _______________________________________________ ImageJ-devel mailing list ImageJ-devel@imagej.net http://imagej.net/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel
