Hi Nico, > Would it be possible to explain somewhere public the relation between > Fiji.sc and ImageJ.net for both visitors and contributors?
This is a good discussion to have with the community. Up till now, the idea has been that fiji.sc is more appropriate when giving links to Fiji-specific content (e.g., http://fiji.sc/Fiji_contribution_requirements), whereas imagej.net is best for topics relevant to ImageJ in general. But, I think it will continue to be a source of confusion moving forward. It might be best if all fiji.sc URLs simply redirect to imagej.net in the future. What do others think? > It appears these are the same with a different skin That is correct. > editing a page on Fiji.sc results in a server error It should work if you click the "Edit source" link. The "Edit" link tries to load the WYSIWYG editor, which is currently broken. That said, I personally always just use imagej.net to edit. Regards, Curtis On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Nico Stuurman <nico.stuur...@ucsf.edu> wrote: > Would it be possible to explain somewhere public the relation between > Fiji.sc and ImageJ.net for both visitors and contributors? It appears > these are the same with a different skin, but whereas editing a page on > Fiji.sc results in a server error, editing ImageJ.net is OK. Some > explanation to contributors, for instance in a welcome email after > registering would save time. > > Best, > > Nico > > > _______________________________________________ > ImageJ-devel mailing list > ImageJ-devel@imagej.net > http://imagej.net/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel > >
_______________________________________________ ImageJ-devel mailing list ImageJ-devel@imagej.net http://imagej.net/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel
