I also am using 4.07 and have found that each message MUST start with:
From <username@domain> Wed May 26 17:53:57 1999
I also noticed that the username@domain can be anything you want. It
appears to be ignored - at least by Outlook Express (the header is nowhere
to be found once it gets to the client side.
-----Original Message-----
From: John A. Junod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, May 27, 1999 7:10 AM
Subject: RE:RE:Re: [IMail Forum] POP3 maildrop questions
>No, its all the same. However 4.x may not be able to
>deal with manually added messages or other tampering
>of the mailbox.
>
>John
>
>In reply to 27 May message from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>>Yes and yes. The From that you are referring to I format as
>>follows:
>>From <username@domain> Wed May 26 17:53:57 1999
>>I am using 4.07. Is there a different parsing method in place
>>for later versions?
>
>>Chris
>
>
>>----------------------------------------------
>>Original Message
>>From: "John A. Junod"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: RE:Re: [IMail Forum] POP3 maildrop questions Date: Wed,
>>26 May 1999 19:30:38 -0500
>
>>>If you had no body, did you have two CR/LF pairs at the end
>>>of the mailbox? Did the message start with "From " ?
>>>
>>>John
>>>
>>>In reply to 26 May message from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>>>
>>>>If you do not add the X-UIDL: header, how will Imail realize that
>>>>there is another message? The reason I ask is because I have added
>>>>directly to the .mbx (deleting the .uid of course), but the message
>>>>that I was adding had no body. Imail would not recognize that as
>>>>an additional message. It would simply append that message to the
>>>>previous message's body (as if it were an attachm
>
>>_____________________________________________
>>Get your free personalized email address at
>>http://www.MyOwnEmail.com
>
>
>
>
