Never Never Lose the RAM !!! (:->) Someone else will use it, tomorrow
something else will require it. Bill Gates OS will swallow it whole and
leave you 8 MB to run IMAIL in anyway...
-V
----- Original Message -----
From: Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 11, 1999 1:37 PM
Subject: RE:Re: [IMail Forum] Is anyone out there using
> Definitly overkill for that many users. You should be in a good position
> with the dual processors (although imail may not use both processors, nt
> will when distributing threads), but lose the 1GB of RAM. 265mb would be
> more than sufficiant for that kind of load.
>
> Chris
> ----------------------------------------------
> Original Message
> From: "Don"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Is anyone out there using
> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 10:01:26 -0600
>
> >Sounds like mucho over kill to me. Is the Ipswitch program written to
> >utilize two processers. If not, typically the server will only use one
> >processer to handle the load.
> >
> >Don
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Benn Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Friday, June 11, 1999 9:26 AM
> >Subject: [IMail Forum] Is anyone out there using
> >
> >
> >> ...IMail server with 100,000 accounts?
> >>
> >> Is it stable? Considering running that many accounts on a dual
> PIII500Mhz
> >> with 1GB RAM, and a 145GB external RAID array.
> >>
> >> Any thoughts?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> Chris Terrebonne
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.myownemail.com
>
> _____________________________________________
> Free email with personality! Over 200 domains!
> http://www.MyOwnEmail.com
>
>
