IMHO it is a clear choice. Go with the heavyweight! Integrating Anti-Virus
is the same task no matter what mail server sits behind it. Cost structure
is better. Anti-Spam requires some tweaking but can be done well with
Imail. Scalability is there. many on this list run tens of thousands of
clients with ease on IMAIL. Hey I should be getting a commission! :)
-V
PS See professional Quality Graphics below!
/
/ I
* / I
I / I
I / I
/ NT Mail
/ ~~~~~~~~
/
/
I
I
I
I
IMAIL
~~~~~~~
Go with the heavyweight! IMAIL Rules!
----- Original Message -----
From: Phil Daws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 26, 1999 2:24 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum] IMail vs SendMail NT
> Hi,
>
> I am re-evaluating my email solution. I am running IMail V4 at present
and
> deciding whether to upgrade to V5 or SendMail NT. What I am looking for
is
> scalability, anti-spam and the ability to plug in anti-virus scanning.
Does
> anybody have any experience of the two products, pros-cons etc ... Any
> feedback would be greatly appreciated.
>
> regards,
>
> \ Phil Daws, Technical Director /
> \ V-Host Internet Solutions Ltd, UK /
> \ "Customer Focused - Innovative Solutions" /
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
>
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
