At 02:07 PM 11/1/99 -0500, you wrote: >If you're going to do something so radical.. at least contain the damage... > >Try 38.29.63.0, 255.255.255.0 >and 38.29.64.0, 255.255.255.0 Would IP-based inbound blocking be done through the "Control Access" setting? I had been thinking that it was to control POP access only, but never really checked it out. -- Kirk Mitchell-General Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Keystone Connect Unlock Your World Altoona, PA 814-941-5000 http://www.keyconn.net Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list.
- [IMail Forum] excluding user from spam filter rules Anthony Poisson
- Re: [IMail Forum] excluding user from spam filter rul... ## Dusty Carden
- Re: [IMail Forum] excluding user from spam filter... Anthony Poisson
- Re: [IMail Forum] excluding user from spam fi... ## Dusty Carden
- Re: [IMail Forum] excluding user from spa... Anthony Poisson
- Re: [IMail Forum] excluding user fro... Anthony Poisson
- Re: [IMail Forum] excluding user fro... ## Dusty Carden
- [IMail Forum] netmask for killing spam from i... Sales
- Re: [IMail Forum] netmask for killing spa... Madscientist
- Re: [IMail Forum] netmask for killin... K Mitchell
- Re: [IMail Forum] netmask for killin... Peter Salvage
- Re: [IMail Forum] netmask for killin... Sales
- Re: [IMail Forum] netmask for ki... Peter Salvage
- [IMail Forum] What a mess...... Chris Hunt
- Re: [IMail Forum] excluding user from spam filter rul... David Gregg
