As far as I can tell (with my experience with WLBS) Imail should be configured as peers and NOT load balanced. They will share the load for a domain but will not provide fault tolerance. Someone tell me if I am mistaken.... _______________________________ Bryan Andrews Site Administrator - CCI Web 404.843.7408 404.847.6335 fax 404.597.2316 cel Cox Communications, Inc. 1400 Lake Hearn Drive Atlanta, GA 30319 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________ -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 1999 1:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] SQL 7.0 Clustering vs Windows Load Balancing Service Hello, I have built an IMAIL system based on two IMAIL servers in a load balanced environment. This arrangement seems to be causing some problems - as far as I can work out, WLBS balances individual requests from a user, rather than the overall user session. The result is that the user cannot use the system! Has anyone tried using IMAIL server in a Clustered (or any other high availability arrangement)? I gather this is not an officially supported option, but does anyone have any comments? Regards, Mark McSherry The information contained in this E-mail is confidential. It may also be legally privileged. It is intended only for the stated addressee(s) and access to it by any other person is unauthorised. If you are not an addressee, you must not disclose, copy, circulate or in any other way use or rely on the information contained in this E-mail. Such unauthorised use may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please delete it from your system. If you require assistance, please contact our IS support desk. Thank you. ( E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list.
