remove unsubscribe *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 08.08.05 at 11:01 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >From: "Bruce Barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: HELP! WINDOWS LOCAL POLICY. >Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 02:23:13 -0500 >Reply-To: [email protected] > > >The NTRights contained within the MS W2K Resource Kit only works if REMOTE >PROCEEDURE SERVICES and REMOTE REGISTRY SERVUCES is running. > >For SECURITY purposes, both of these services should be STOPPED, and >DISABLED, on all SERVERS and WORKSTATIONS. > >If these services are running, on machines with PUBLICLLY ACCESSIBLE IP >ADDRESS and there is poor router and / or firewall security, they become a >loophole whereby hackers can attack and take over a network. > >You can GOOGLE on REQUIRED NT SERVICES or REQUIRED 2000 SERVICES or >REQUIRED >XP SERVICES for more information on which services are required and which >ones can be stopped without affecting the ability of a workstation or >server >to do the job for which it was intended. XP workstation is particularly >vulnerable if service pack 2 has not yet been applied because there is a >service that lets Microsoft "assist" a user with his or her machine that's >easily accessed by spyware and hackers. > >Doing similar searches on Technet can provide similar information. > >Stopping and disabling unnecessary services on servers and workstation both >saves resources and closes many of the security loopholes that are built >into the MS product line. > >Always, make certain you are aware of the effect of stopping any services >before you log out of the machine. > >Bruce Barnes >ChicagoNetTech Inc > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lim Siew Yin >Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 01:18 >To: [email protected] >Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: HELP! WINDOWS LOCAL POLICY. > > > >MS W2K Resource Kit has a program called NTRights that allowed me to >remotely change policy. >Managed to tracked it down after some search. > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Troy Hilton >Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 10:14 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: HELP! WINDOWS LOCAL POLICY. > > >So, what'd you do? > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lim Siew Yin >Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 5:20 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: HELP! WINDOWS LOCAL POLICY. > > >Whew... problem solved. No worries. :P > > >SY Lim. > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lim Siew Yin >Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 5:35 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: HELP! WINDOWS LOCAL POLICY. > > > >Hi ppl, > >I am in HOT SOUP now. I was playing w the windows local policy .. trying >to >deny logon to the server for normal USERS. >I set deny logon to ENABLE for the group USER. > >Now... as an Administrator.. i cant even logon. *sob* *faint* > >I keep getting the mesg "The Local Policy of this system does not permit >you >to logon interactively". > >Arrghhh.... I am sooooo lost.. i dare not tell my boss... *sweat drop* > >What went wrong? I thought I only deny USERS... why am I also not allowed >to logon? > >Please tell me I have another way out other than to format it again.... >:( > > >SY Lim the Desperate. > > > >To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html >List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ >Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > > >To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html >List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ >Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > > >To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html >List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ >Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > > >To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html >List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ >Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >From: "Pasquale Viscione - Dial S.p.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: R: [IMail Forum] Download very slowly >Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 11:34:02 +0200 >Reply-To: [email protected] > >Hi, >Since two days, every morning, I have the problem that my customer have >problem with download of the >message. >Download is very slowly. >I restart the server, and after I restart It, it is all ok. >Imail is ver. 8.04 and is configured on win2000 server. >During this download slowly, I monitoring ram, processor, disk space and >connection ad it is all ok. >I have Imail illimited version and on this server, I have configured only >45 hosts and 400 users. >What can I do' What's happened? >Regards. > >Pasquale. > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------- >e-mail esaminata dall'antivirus e dall'antispam della Dial S.p.A.- Nessun >virus rilevato - www.dial.it >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------- >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >From: "Dan Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: HELP! WINDOWS LOCAL POLICY. >Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 07:07:14 -0400 >Reply-To: [email protected] >To fix a properly secured NT machine with an error like this, use one of >the >linux boot CD's. You must have physical access to use the tools, but you >can >fix things easily. I don't remember the link, but I believe the name of the >one I use was "Ultimate Boot CD". It boots a menu, that then boots one of >about 100 different tools, among them, Registry Edit and Reset >Administrator >Password. > >If the BIOS is password protected such that you can't direct the machine to >boot from CD, then you have no choice but to reset the nvram (CMOS) on the >motherboard. Not a big deal if you documented your changes from default. > >In any case, you can always get there from here, and not all of the paths >involve the format and restore keywords! > >Dan > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bruce Barnes >Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 3:23 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: HELP! WINDOWS LOCAL POLICY. > > > > >The NTRights contained within the MS W2K Resource Kit only works if REMOTE >PROCEEDURE SERVICES and REMOTE REGISTRY SERVUCES is running. > >For SECURITY purposes, both of these services should be STOPPED, and >DISABLED, on all SERVERS and WORKSTATIONS. > >If these services are running, on machines with PUBLICLLY ACCESSIBLE IP >ADDRESS and there is poor router and / or firewall security, they become a >loophole whereby hackers can attack and take over a network. > >You can GOOGLE on REQUIRED NT SERVICES or REQUIRED 2000 SERVICES or >REQUIRED >XP SERVICES for more information on which services are required and which >ones can be stopped without affecting the ability of a workstation or >server >to do the job for which it was intended. XP workstation is particularly >vulnerable if service pack 2 has not yet been applied because there is a >service that lets Microsoft "assist" a user with his or her machine that's >easily accessed by spyware and hackers. > >Doing similar searches on Technet can provide similar information. > >Stopping and disabling unnecessary services on servers and workstation both >saves resources and closes many of the security loopholes that are built >into the MS product line. > >Always, make certain you are aware of the effect of stopping any services >before you log out of the machine. > >Bruce Barnes >ChicagoNetTech Inc > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lim Siew Yin >Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 01:18 >To: [email protected] >Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: HELP! WINDOWS LOCAL POLICY. > > > >MS W2K Resource Kit has a program called NTRights that allowed me to >remotely change policy. >Managed to tracked it down after some search. > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Troy Hilton >Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 10:14 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: HELP! WINDOWS LOCAL POLICY. > > >So, what'd you do? > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lim Siew Yin >Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 5:20 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: HELP! WINDOWS LOCAL POLICY. > > >Whew... problem solved. No worries. :P > > >SY Lim. > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lim Siew Yin >Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 5:35 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: HELP! WINDOWS LOCAL POLICY. > > > >Hi ppl, > >I am in HOT SOUP now. I was playing w the windows local policy .. trying >to >deny logon to the server for normal USERS. >I set deny logon to ENABLE for the group USER. > >Now... as an Administrator.. i cant even logon. *sob* *faint* > >I keep getting the mesg "The Local Policy of this system does not permit >you >to logon interactively". > >Arrghhh.... I am sooooo lost.. i dare not tell my boss... *sweat drop* > >What went wrong? I thought I only deny USERS... why am I also not allowed >to logon? > >Please tell me I have another way out other than to format it again.... >:( > > >SY Lim the Desperate. > > > >To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html >List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ >Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > > >To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html >List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ >Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > > >To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html >List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ >Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > > >To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html >List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ >Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > > >To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html >List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ >Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >From: "Kathy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: [IMail Forum] Fw:À´¿´¿´°®ÇéдÕæÎÝ°É^_^ >Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 22:16:24 +0800 >Reply-To: [email protected] ><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" >"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";> ><html> ><head> ><title>ÎÞ±êÌâÎĵµ</title> ><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=gb2312"> ><style type="text/css"> ><!-- >body,td,th { > font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; > font-size: 16px; >} >.Ñùʽ1 {font-size: 14px} >--> ></style></head> > ><body> ><table width="600" border="0" cellspacing="2" cellpadding="0"> > <tr> > <td><p>ÎÒÒ²Óа®ÇéдÕ漯ÁË£¬¿´ ÉÏÈ¥»¹Í¦ÓÐ÷ÈÁ¦µÄ<br> > ´ó¼ÒҲȥ¿´¿´°É ^O^ </p> > <p class="Ñùʽ1">-----Original Message----- </p> </td> > </tr> > <tr> > <td bgcolor="#E0E0E0" class="Ñùʽ1"><strong>From: </strong>Àî Àö </td> > </tr> > <tr> > <td><p class="Ñùʽ1"> <strong>Sent: </strong>Sunday, August 05, >2099 9: 3 3 AM <br> > <strong>To: </strong><a href="mailto:1 1 beauti9@ 1 6 3 .com ">1 1 >beauti9@ 1 6 3 .com </a><br> > <strong>Subject: </strong> Fw: Õâ¸öÍøÕ¾ºÃ¿É°®µÄ ~ ¿ÉÒÔ×÷°®ÇéдÕ漯Ŷ ></p> > <p>Õâ¸ö½Ð¡¸Ê±¹â¾Ã¾Ã - °®ÇéдÕæÎÝ¡¹µÄÍøÕ¾ºÃ cool Ŷ¡«¸Ð¾õºÜÓÐÌØÉ« <br> > <a href="http://www.time99.com"; target="_blank">http://www.Time99.com ></a></p> ><p>¿ÉÒÔÔÚÏßÖÆ×÷´óÍ·ÌùºÍ¸öÈ ËдÕ漯¡¢ä¯ÀÀºÃÓÑÏà²á¡¢Òª ½á»éµÄÅóÓÑ»¹ÓлéÀñÖúÊÖ¡¢<br> > ÍøÂçϲÌûµÈµÈ¡«¸Ð¾õͦºÃÍæµ Ä ~ ¶øÇÒ¶¼ÊÇ free Ãâ·Ñ >µÄ£¡ºÃÏñ¸Õ¸Ä°æÁ˼¸Ìì¡«ÒÑ<br > > ¾Óв»ÉÙÈËÔÚÍæÄØ </p> > <p>ÎÒ×÷ÁËÁ½±¾Ïà²á <br> > >Ò»±¾ÊÇÎÒºÍÄÐÅóÓѵ½¹úÍâÍæ Õյģ¬ÔÒÔΪÕâÑùµÄСÍøÕ¾² Ù×÷»áºÜÂé·³£¬¶øÇÒ»áÓÐ<br> > >¹ã¸æÌøÀ´ÌøÈ¥µÄ£¬µ«ÊÇÕæÕý ²Ù×÷ÆðÀ´È´ºÜ¼òµ¥£¬½çÃ滹º ÜÕû½à£¬ÈÃÈË¿´Á˺ÜÊæ·þ¡« ><br> > <br> > >ÁíÒ»±¾ÊÇÎÒÃÇ×Ô¼º×öµÄ´óÍ· ÌùдÕ漯£¬Óкܶ಻ͬµÄ¸öÐ Ô»¯Ïà¿òŶ£¬½ÐºÜ¶àÅóÓÑ<br> > À´¿´¹ýÁË£¬¶¼ËµºÃƯÁÁ£¬Ëûà ÇÒ²Òª×öÄØ¡« > <br> > <br> > ÄãÒ²¸Ï¿ì¼ÓÈë°É£¬ÀïÃ滹Óк ܶà¿É°®µÄ > ±¦±¦ºÍÃÀÅ®µÄдÕ漯ÄØ¡«<br> > <br> > <strong>PS. </strong>°ÑÕâÓÐȤÍøվת·¢¸øºÃÓÑ ß ^_^ >ÏàÐÅÄãµÄÅóÓѿ϶¨»áÂùϲ»¶ µÄ¡«´ó¼ÒÒ»ÆðÀ´<br> > ÍøÂçÉÏ×ö°®ÇéдÕ漯ß </p> </td> > </tr> > <tr> ></table> ></body> ></html> >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >From: "RMilner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] FW: Spam >Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 11:00:32 -0400 >Reply-To: [email protected] >Is there any wonder this continues? > >Have the fixed the issues security issues from IMAIL 6.0 yet? > >I guess Kathy's spam will be removed just after they fix that. > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gerry >Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 7:23 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] FW: Spam > > >Quoting from http://www.ipswitch.com/support/imail/discussion_list.asp it >says: >"People who send offensive or abusive messages will be barred from the >list." > > >So how long do these abusive spams have to post to the list before Ipswitch >considers this abusive and removes the sender from the list? Several >members now and in the past seem to agree that these posts are abuse, and >do >not belong here. > >From: "Gerry " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>So what about unsubscribing and removing that user from the list??? >> >>From: "Tripp Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Because the list servers are subscriber only we are currently not >>>running any antispam filters on the list servers. This person is >>>getting their spam through somehow so we have to track it down. >>> >>>Tripp >>> >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RMilner >>>Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 3:45 PM >>>To: [email protected] >>>Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] FW: Spam >>> >>> >>>amazing that a company that is trying to sell an antispam product >>>cannot stop spam on its own list. It speaks highly of the product >>>effectiveness. > > > > >To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html >List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ >Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > >__________ NOD32 1.1185 (20050801) Information __________ > >This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. >http://www.eset.com > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >From: "Doug Traylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] OT: HELP! WINDOWS LOCAL POLICY. >Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 10:41:01 -0500 >Reply-To: [email protected] >There is a Live CD based on Windows instead of Linux. > >http://www.ubcd4win.com/ > >I use it all the time. > >Also, if you have the $ you need ERD Commander from Winternals. It is a >Windows Live boot CD that can link to the registry of the afflicted system >and make fixes very quick and easy. It does not have as many tools as the >UBCD for Windows but is much more polished and professional. > >Doug > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Dan Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[email protected]> >Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 6:07 AM >Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: HELP! WINDOWS LOCAL POLICY. > > >> To fix a properly secured NT machine with an error like this, use one of >> the >> linux boot CD's. You must have physical access to use the tools, but you >> can >> fix things easily. I don't remember the link, but I believe the name of >> the >> one I use was "Ultimate Boot CD". It boots a menu, that then boots one of >> about 100 different tools, among them, Registry Edit and Reset >> Administrator >> Password. >> >> If the BIOS is password protected such that you can't direct the machine >> to >> boot from CD, then you have no choice but to reset the nvram (CMOS) on >the >> motherboard. Not a big deal if you documented your changes from default. >> >> In any case, you can always get there from here, and not all of the paths >> involve the format and restore keywords! >> >> Dan > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >From: "Andy Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: [IMail Forum] Imail 8.2 - now 127.0.0.1 / localhost has been >overlooked! >Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 15:07:52 -0400 >Reply-To: [email protected] >Hi, > >So now that we can restrict Imail to specific IP addresses - how does one >re-enable support for 127.0.0.1 / localhost. > >If the option to bind to ALL Ips is on, then a telnet 127.0.0.1 25 will be >successful. > >However, if you limit Imail to "specific" IP Addresses, then 127.0.0.1 will >no longer respond. And, there is no way to "add" 127.0.0.1 or "localhost" >as >a mail domain. > >I think it's a design flaw - 127.0.0.1 / localhost should ALWAYS be >supported. > >Best Regards >Andy Schmidt > >Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) >Fax: +1 201 934-9206 > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >From: "Michael Thomas - Mathbox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: [IMail Forum] Imail 8.2 - now 127.0.0.1 / >localhost has been overlooked! >Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 15:44:47 -0400 >Reply-To: [email protected] >Andy, > >It should be supported, but as a clickable assign. After all, you might >have >another SMTP server assigned to 127.0.0.1. > >Mike > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Andy Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[email protected]> >Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 3:07 PM >Subject: SPAM-WARN: [IMail Forum] Imail 8.2 - now 127.0.0.1 / localhost has >been overlooked! > > >> Hi, >> >> So now that we can restrict Imail to specific IP addresses - how does one >> re-enable support for 127.0.0.1 / localhost. >> >> If the option to bind to ALL Ips is on, then a telnet 127.0.0.1 25 will >be >> successful. >> >> However, if you limit Imail to "specific" IP Addresses, then 127.0.0.1 >will >> no longer respond. And, there is no way to "add" 127.0.0.1 or "localhost" >as >> a mail domain. >> >> I think it's a design flaw - 127.0.0.1 / localhost should ALWAYS be >> supported. >> >> Best Regards >> Andy Schmidt >> >> Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) >> Fax: +1 201 934-9206 >> >> >> To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html >> List Archive: >http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ >> Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ >> >> > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >From: "Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: [IMail Forum] Oulook 2003 - Imail bug? >Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:38:05 -0500 >Reply-To: [email protected] >Here is the case. I want to see if you guys think this is a bug or an error >by design. > >Scenario. Oulook 2003 with 2 email accounts, one in using as SMTP an Imail >Server and another one a non Imail Server. Let's say Yahoo. This test is >under a 8.14 version of Imail using SMTP authentication > >1.Send an email using the Account that relays in the IMAIL SMTP server. >Make >sure you specifically send it to a non existing mail box within IMAIL. The >domain is hosted in Imail but the mailbox doesn't exist. Example >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >2. What happens is that Imail sends a response back saying that the >usermailbox doesn't exist and curiously Outlook 2003 then goes to the >second >Email account configured in their list and sends it via that second email >account, in this example case, via Yahoo. The message back from Imail is >undetected by the user. > >You will then get a message back from your second email account mail server >saying that user [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't exist. Check your Imail >logs, you will see 2 tries to deliver a message to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >One from your first email account (the one that relay in your Imail server) >and the second try from your Yahoo account. In both tries, Imail respond >that the user doesn't exist. > >Bug: Why Outlook 2003 sends and email using the second email account when >you specifically tell him to use the first email account the one that >relays >in the Imail Box.? > >Funny things: >Try to do the same as step one but this time send it to a mail box in a >domain not hosted in your Imail Server, for example >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >You will get a response back from your Imail server saying that the message >couldn't be delivered - a regular email message-. And Outlook doesn't try >to >send it using the second email account. > >Now try to do the same with you yahoo email account. Send an email relaying >on yahoo to a yahoo account, let's say [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you >won't see Outlook trying to use the second email account (your email >account >at Imail) trying to send it since it is a non existent account. > >Outlook only tries to deliver the message using the second email account in >your list when you send it via Imail to a non existen mailbox within your >Imail Server. Seems like the response given by Imail is likely to be >recognized as an exchange response and Outlook tries to send the messsage >using the secondary email account at all costs. > > > >______ >[Email scanned for viruses] >[Email escaneado contra virus] ======================== eyejet [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.eyejet.com ======================== To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
