I second that. I've been using it for a few years trouble free.

John Cesta

iMAIL Reporter - Reports on iMAIL server and POP users
LogFileManager - IIS LogFile Management Tool
WebPageChecker - Helps Maintain Server UpTime
DomainReportIt PRO - Helps Rebuild IIS
http://www.serverautomationtools.com


On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 11:41:11 +1200, Terence Blyth wrote:
> I like simpleDNS
>
> Regards
>
> Terence Blyth
>
> Computer Technologies Ltd
>
> Phone 64 3 545 9001
>
> Fax     64 3 545 9002
>
>
> WARNING: The contents of this e-mail may contain information that
> is legally privileged and/or confidential to the named recipient.
> This information is not to be used by any other person and/or
> organisation.  The views expressed in this document do not
> necessarily reflect those of Computer Technologies Ltd.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Guluk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, 10 September 2005 11:40 a.m.
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Strange occasional random issue
>
> Oh what a day from hell...... How do you pick a good DNS server? I
> had one from Verio that I've used for the last couple years
> 161.58.158.113
> Ipswitch Techs had me try one of there's while we were testing all
> the various problems. Worked well with theirs so I assumed that
> mine was not too good... I called Verio where my servers are hosted
> and they could not tell me much information about the DNS IP I
> posted above. They suggested that because it was a cache DNS server
> it looks like it may not always be available and maybe retired
> soon... Quite frankly I think the Gal knew less than I did about
> the server... None the less I tracerouted to the primary dns
> servers (ns1 and ns2 .DN.net) and used these in the SMTP area of
> iMail 8.21 These worked poorly and allowed my queue to grow to over
> 100 emails and stay at that point . Restarting the SMTP server
> would clear half of them but then back to the same state... People
> started calling because there were errors such as "553 Requested
> action not taken: Relaying not permitted" or "553 sorry, that
> domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1)"... I
> switched back to the IP above and it immediately cleared the cache
> and now hovers around 7 or 8 emails pending. Why does one DNS
> server IP work better than others? 207.153.206.126 and
> 161.58.158.45 (bound to ns1 and 2 as mentioned above) failed to
> perform worth while.
>
> You would think a company like Verio would have great DNS servers?
> Am I missing something? I'm thinking of moving to Rackspace at the
> end of the month and hope they can help.
>
> Regards,
>
> Steve
>
>
> On Sep 9, 2005, at 10:49 AM, Darin Cox wrote:
>
>> Ok, so according to this the mail server could not connect to the
>> primary rackspace.com mail server.
>>
>> According to http://dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?
>> domain=rackspace.com,
>> everything looks good for rackspace.com, so this may have been a
>> temporary
>> issue with the rackspace.com mail server, or connectivity between
>> your server and theirs.
>>
>> Darin.
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> List Archive: http://www.mail-
> archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ:
> http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
>
>
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Computer Technologies Ltd
> www.ctec.co.nz]
>
>
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Computer Technologies Ltd
> www.ctec.co.nz]




To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to