ASSP supports multiple domains as we are running 15 or so. The biggest problem I have with it is it likes to reject things like cnet news. What I did was send all these at the start to a mail box and then I used outlook express (drag and drop) to put the various pieces of not spam in there prospective folders.
One of the biggest advantages of ASSP is. The amount of time we spend maintaining it most of the time it goes into the upgrades. I do occasionally go through the spam collection folder and clean it up. I just wish the latest version of Imail (web interface) would have a report as spam. So we can make spammer filters better. Ttyl, Allen Armstrong > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Burglehaus > Sent: December 20, 2005 11:18 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: ASSP ( was: RE: [IMail Forum] under attack) > > Are you running multiple domains through ASSP? The biggest drawback I saw > to it was that it seemed to be more of a solution for a single domain. > > Ryan > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jason Loven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 11:00 AM > Subject: ASSP ( was: RE: [IMail Forum] under attack) > > > Let me put in my vote *FOR* ASSP. I've been running it now for several > revisions and it's been a huge boon. We actually tried moving away from > it for a while and the increase in spam during that period pushed us > right back to it. I don't have hard statistics for the false > negative/positive aspect but I do know I receive *no* complaints from > our users or the customers who we host for. On the other hand when it > was shut off (replaced by SpamAssassin+MailScanner) the complaints > started the next day until we put it back. > > FYI..I'm running v1.1.1 so I don't know much about the new features in > v1.1.2 but if they improvements are of the same quality as the existing > product I have to believe it can only make a great product better. > > YMMV. > > -Jason > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Puetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 7:18 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] under attack > > > After reading some chapters of the manual, i really have to test this > > free product. > > After I read some of the docs, I came to a very different conclusion. I > was immediately turned off by the author's following statement: > > "First it is unlikely (not impossible, but unusual) that you receive > critical business correspondance from someone you HAVE NEVER EMAILED > before. > I don't have a percentage, but I know that business doesn't work that > way. > Business is built on relationship, and relationship doesn't come out of > the blue." > > This is simply bizarre, not to mention more than a little arrogant. I > can't imagine implementing a product that uses this philosophy as its > foundation, and I can't imagine a business that would be willing to risk > prospective customer inquiries. > > I must be missing something. > > Bill > > > > > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > List Archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > > > > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > > > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
