I will have to find out if I can give you a few users mail. It isn't my call but I am almost sure the boss man will say no.
Later, ----------------------------------------- Travis Rabe Technology Director -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin R. Gillis Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 2:43 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] [imailcore] Imail 2006 Punch List? Hello Travis, Regarding this one, we have tried, but unsuccessfully, to reproduce this one. is it okay if we contact you and possibly get your directory zipped up and sent to us? >TR>>Sure. But I can tell you exactly how to reproduce. Form one IP, log >into web messaging. Send some mail, delete some mail and so on. Go to you >other computer and open your Outlook 2003/2002 account with IMAP and now you have an additional folder called main (always lower case) that is a mirror >image of INBOX that you can't get rid of until you delete the INBOX.XML >file. bye for now, kg -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 10:53 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 2006 Punch List? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin R. Gillis Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 8:10 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 2006 Punch List? Hello Travis, Thanks for the comments. Comments below. bye for now, kg -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 5:27 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 2006 Punch List? 1. Cannot edit/update the Relay For Addresses file. This file is the smtp32.loc file. This means that you cannot add any new clients to you existing mail servers. ==KG> This is addressed in IMail 2006.02 coming next week. TR>>OK 2. IMAP and Web messaging interfere by creating a duplicate MAIN mailbox within Outlook clients. There si now ay to get around this until you manually delete the INBOX.XML file. ==KG> We have heard about this but don't think we have a reproducible case. Can our TS group call you to track this down? TR>>Sure. But I can tell you exactly how to reproduce. Form one IP, log into web messaging. Send some mail, delete some mail and so on. Go to you other computer and open your Outlook 2003/2002 accoutn with IMAP and now you have an additional folder called main (always lower case) that is a mirror image of INBOX that you can't get rid of until you delete the INBOX.XML file. 3. Web Messaging interface is slowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww. ==KG> Could this possibly be an issue with SMTPD? Is it possible to get access to an account? We've tried this on another account and have not been able to reproduce the performance issues. Also, are these dial-up users and roughly how big are the folders they are accessing? TR>>Sure. They are mostly high speed users that have seen a marked decrease in speed form the old interface to the new. We have a T1 going to the mail server which is pretty much dedicated to that purpose. It is drastically slower. The machine I have is brand new (less than 60 days old) with all the bells and whistles and I would expect a lot better performance for an out of the box product. 4. The Web Messaging interface as it works now, requires way to unsecured set of permissions in order to work correctly. ==KG> We have an alternative IIS permissions model doc that we are having expert users review. Would you be interested in reviewing? TR>>Nice. 5. Web Calendaring is all but gone. ==KG> The Web Calendaring has not changed in this release. You still should be able to access/use them - I believe even with Safari. We will be, in the next sprint or two, adding back a link to Web Calendaring from within Web Messaging. TR>>That is what I was referring to. 6. Public shared contacts are gone. These existed before in the .cgi file in the web directory. ==KG> This was a parity issue and are back in, in the 2006.02 release coming next week. TR>> This will save me a lot of grief. Hopefully in the midst of fixing this you get a way to import all of the old stuff. 7. SMTP AND IIS use a lot of resources. The more the machine runs the more memory it gobbles up. I reboot now every third day. ==KG> You should not have to reboot every 3rd day. Are you seeing a leak or some sort in SMTP? >>TR That would be my guess. It comes and goes but the IMAP seems to spiek when there are more Web Messaging users onboard. 8. Overall POP3 and IMAP performance has greatly slowed. ==KG> Not sure about this one. These core services were not really touched from 8.2x to IMail 2006. What kind of performance issues are you seeing? Slow sending/receiving? TR>> YES! If you compare an 8.22 server to a 2006.01 server on all functions, I guarantee there is a much slower response on IMAP, POP3, and WEB. It is very noticeable even on a clean install with no users but a few. This is one of the biggest drawbacks in my opinion. When you have tons of users comparing "when I checked my email last week it came in right away, now for some reason it goes much slower." OR "Why does it take twice as long for Outlook to download my messages" OR "When I login into the web page, it takes a long time for the first page to load. And if I have a long list of messages it takes even longer to load each page of my INBOX. Kevin, I appreciate your willingness to help, but these are all things that should have been caught a long time ago. I have been a supporter of you and Ipswitch since this release, but it seems there are quite a few issues that never should have never made it out of beta. Later, Travis -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Bowman Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 2:10 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 2006 Punch List? I would love to see a punch list of all issues! Richard Bowman -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Brantley Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 4:59 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [IMail Forum] Imail 2006 Punch List? I appreciate all of the Imail 2006 feedback from the list participants. Having been an Ipswitch customer since the TCP/IP product days and an Imail site since v4, I want Ipswtich to be successful. I want Imail to be improved and expand it's market share. Given that... I have a policy of not installing an upgrade, hot fix or a new version of Imail until I have watched this mailing list and determined the upgrade, hot fix or new version does not impact my clients. While I would like to move forward on Imail 2006, I see too many issues at this time. I would like to see a punch list of outstanding problems with Imail 2006. What are the top five issues with Imail 2006? db To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
